🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have voted to withdraw from an international accord created to protect females from abuse, including family violence, following extensive and heated debates in the parliament.

Thousands of demonstrators gathered in Riga this past week to voice disagreement with the vote. The ultimate authority now rests with Head of State Edgars Rinkevics, who must decide whether to approve or reject the legislation.

Known as the Istanbul Convention, the 2011 agreement only took effect in Latvia last year, mandating authorities to establish laws and support services to end all forms of abuse.

The Baltic nation has become the first European Union member to begin the process of exiting from the convention. Turkey withdrew in 2021, a move that rights groups characterized as a significant setback for women's rights.

Ideological Debate and Resistance

The treaty was ratified by the EU in last year, yet traditionalist groups have argued that its emphasis on gender equality undermines traditional families and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a lengthy discussion in the Latvian parliament, lawmakers voted by a margin of 56-32 to withdraw from the convention, a action sponsored by opposition parties but backed by politicians from one of the three governing partners.

The outcome represents a setback for centre-right Prime Minister the nation's PM, who stood with demonstrators outside parliament earlier this week. "We will not surrender, we will persist in our struggle so that violence does not triumph," she declared to the assembly.

Ideological Disagreements and Responses

One of the main political groups advocating for the withdrawal is a nationalist party, whose head has called on citizens to choose between what he terms a "natural family" and "gender ideology with various gender identities".

The nation's ombudswoman the rights official appealed for the treaty not to be made political, while the group the rights organization asserted it was "not a threat to Latvian values, it served as a tool to achieve them".

The Thursday's vote has provoked widespread outcry both inside Latvia and abroad.

22,000 individuals have signed a Latvian petition calling for the convention to be preserved. The gender equality group the rights center has announced a demonstration for next Thursday, accusing MPs of ignoring the wishes of the nation's citizens.

Global Concerns and Potential Future Actions

The leader of the European organization's legislative body stated that the Baltic state had made a hasty choice fueled by misinformation. He characterized it as an "never-before-seen and deeply concerning step backward for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in Europe".

He noted that since the transcontinental nation abandoned the treaty four years ago, instances of femicide and violence against women had risen sharply.

Because the vote did not secure a supermajority support, the head of state could possibly return the legislation for further review if he holds concerns.

Head of State the national leader stated on social media that he would assess the decision according to constitutional principles, "taking into account governmental and judicial considerations, rather than ideological or political viewpoints".

Recently, another member of the governing alliance, the Progressives, indicated it would not exclude petitioning to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a concerning development for gender equality not only in Latvia but across the continent," commented a rights advocate.

• Domestic abuse statistics have been increasing in multiple European countries
• The European treaty requires specific legal protections for survivors of domestic abuse
• The nation's decision could influence comparable debates in additional member states