Each time a significant prize-giving event approaches, one notices an outcry to include additional classifications to acknowledge overlooked contributions and delight the passions of followers dedicated to specific genres.
A fellow writer made the case advocating for terror-themed awards. It would be amazing. The same goes for strategy board titles, representing someone's personal cause. However, I must insist if I try to elbow in front because like all blinkered fanatics, I possess a compelling case for why my demand stands as crucial above others. The demand is this: It's essential to create an award type for logic-based games.
The Genre Classification Challenge
Categorizing art by genre defies precise measurement; opinions vary greatly, and inevitably spark debates and end in fuzzy definitions. It's understandable that cinema institutions don’t do it. However, it represents an unavoidable compromise for the industry of video games, showing incredible range they hardly constitute a single creative category.
For the full spectrum of achievement in video games to gain proper attention, and to ensure all game types to receive proper recognition, specific award classifications remain vital.
Present Award Structure
Prominent interactive entertainment events currently feature genre categories for Action-oriented games, Adventure-action titles, RPG experiences, Combat games, Sim/Strategy, and Sports/Racing games. Together, these award types actually cover many game types, making space possible for most games within them.
This doesn't apply to logic-based experiences. No appropriate category exists to accommodate them. Examine these examples from recent excellent titles, each quite distinct: the architectural riddles of one title, fast-paced pattern recognition of another game, engaging interpersonal challenges of a third title. Where could they possibly go within current classifications? Nowhere, that’s where.
The Representation Problem
Numerous examples exist excellent brain-teasers launched regularly lacking appropriate categories at major award shows, except when they manage to fit for categories like Mobile Game, VR/AR Game, and the highly challenging small studio competitions.
- An iconic brain-teaser received no recognition in any category that year
- A different innovative game missed out that year
- Well-received sorting experience got ignored recently
- Just some logic titles barely qualified for small studio or handheld classifications
Value of Brain-Teasers
These are often small games, however the design of the puzzle game carries substantial weight. Iconic mobile puzzle games count as most engaged experiences globally and have been for many years.
The iconic tile-matching title rivals popular creative games claiming status as best-selling game of all time; it also contends for top gaming experience. Brain-teasers form essential building blocks within interactive entertainment, and they are in conversation with diverse game types.
Proposal and Rationale
Logic titles wouldn't face this problem. It would be easy to populate multiple candidates interesting, varied, worthy titles every year with ease — or rather, with difficulty, since numerous excellent so many good games out.
Restating the point, these are games lacking appropriate categories in important events. Logic title developers operate at the demanding boundary game development, developing some of most fundamental forms of the video game form. Comparable to film action specialists, they merit acknowledgment. Let’s not keep them waiting decades.
